I’m not sure if I should mention the firm here, as I would lose my anonymity here. Besides, knowing the name wouldn’t really be helpful…
I wouldn’t call it a case study. In their view, they are still in the right. In their blog article, I am portrayed as a ‘young, dreamy freelancer who is childish and doesn’t want to listen to lawyers’ advice.’ They also altered some facts. For instance, they claimed I said, ‘I found other information on Facebook!’ which I never did. What I actually said was that I found information contradicting their stance on a government forum (a reply by a government representative) and from a government employee I spoke to in person.
I will try, thank you. I believe their headquarters is in Germany and they have a subdivision in Australia. I’m not sure which government is now responsible. I have contacted the data privacy offices in both countries.
Interesting but sounds too good to be true. What’s the catch?
The blog article was published on their website. In the website’s imprint, the Australian subdivision is listed. The blog post was written in German, I received the invoice from their German entity.