PolyPassport recently profiled a Texan woman and her family’s journey from the US to France in search of more affordable healthcare and saner politics. They had EU passports on the basis of ancestry.
It reinforces a lot of the stereotypes we have about healthcare in Europe, particularly on pricing and access overall. Cataract surgery cost her some 300 EUR (!) and her daughter receives free prosthetics every two years.
But her story does dispel the notion that anyone, anywhere can just walk into an EU hospital and get treated—including EU citizens. That’s consistent with my own experience. I’ve lived in a few EU countries and certainly paid less for often high-quality care than in the US. But I never found it to be straightforward or necessarily leagues better than equivalent systems, say, in Asia. Like the woman in the article, I also missed speaking to providers in my native language about ailments that can’t often be conveyed with an A2 level proficiency! :)
It got me thinking about the trade-offs we face when chasing healthcare (or anything really) abroad. It’s about balancing the good with the not-so-good and making the most of our choices wherever we go.
Food for thought and a point discussion.
As a professional patient:
Once you have a personal number, the Norwegian system is smooth as silk, it really is brilliant. I’m getting a power chair and a chair lift soon, along with a bunch of consults and a MRI (there is an imaging facility in the mall, bloody amazing).
Prior to having a personal number, getting the healthcare I needed was a huge bitch - I had to go the ER every month for my prescriptions and docs who don’t know you hate writing scripts for fentanyl - but the system was blind to my existence, so I can’t hate.
The NHS was easily dealt with, at least for me.
TBH the USA’s system has been both the most expensive and the most fragmented, but I may have just gotten lucky with the others.